Adinaa
OP and Jack, married in their 50s, had successful second marriages with grown children from previous unions. Financially well-off, they maintained separate finances but split household expenses. A prenup ensured each kept their pre-marital assets. Jack’s business failure led to OP covering all expenses, but their standard of living remained stable. Recently, facing a health scare, OP decided to revise their will to benefit Thomas, OP’s former step-son. Jack, upset that his children would receive nothing, threatened to leave, claiming OP doesn’t care about him or his kids. OP, prioritizing Thomas due to a strong bond, rejects the ultimatum. Despite initial plans for separate assets, Jack now demands OP’s money for his kids. OP questions if they’re wrong for not complying. AITA?
Scroll down till the end to read the full story.
OP and Jack, married in their 50s for the second time, with Jack’s three children. Financially stable, Jack planned to leave his business to his children.
via Reddit
OP and Jack signed a prenup to keep individual assets. They maintained separate finances, splitting household expenses. Wills were done, with Jack leaving to his children, OP to Thomas.
via Reddit
Jack’s family business collapsed four years ago, but OP, covering all expenses, maintains their lifestyle. Despite financial changes, OP loves Jack and accepts the situation.
via Reddit
After a health scare, OP plans to revise their will, allocating a third each to Thomas’s children, Thomas directly, and a trust for Jack’s support.
via Reddit
Assets in the trust go to Thomas after Jack’s death. OP prioritizes Jack’s well-being but prefers Thomas to inherit, causing conflict with Jack.
via Reddit
Although not biologically related, Thomas is OP’s son in every meaningful way. Jack threatens to leave, claiming OP’s disregard for his kids means no care for him.
via Reddit
OP rejects ultimatums, citing initial plans for separate assets. Jack’s sudden desire for OP to support his kids raises questions. AITA for refusing?
via Reddit
This story shows that sometimes, even in loving relationships, money decisions can be tricky. OP and Jack had plans for their own money before, but when Jack faced financial trouble, he wanted OP to change plans. OP cares deeply for Jack but also has a strong connection with Thomas, her former step-son. The story highlights the challenge of balancing love and financial choices, especially when facing unexpected situations. It’s a reminder that communication and understanding are crucial in relationships, and decisions about money can sometimes lead to difficult conversations. Each person’s perspective and feelings are important to consider for a happy relationship.
OP’s decision is based on a genuine connection with Thomas and a well-thought-out plan for financial security.
NTA – Jack’s ultimatum is unfair.
OP has every right to decide her will.
She’s considering the well-being of those closest to her and maintaining her initial plans.
Just let him leave, that’s what he deserves.
What are your thoughts on this story? What would you do, or how would you react if you were in OP’s position? You know that your feedback means a lot to us; therefore, we want you to share your thoughts in the comment section below. For more such articles, keep visiting Defused. Have a nice day!
Cat tax
“this is baxter. he’s on a diet and last night i caught him trying to break into that container of dog food. shame him.”
via Reddit
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings