Father Refuses To Be The Guarantor For His Child’s Apartment, Upsets Wife And Son

OP’s son, recently graduated from college and is set to begin a master’s program in a few weeks. He’s chosen to go far away from home for this new adventure, despite OP’s advice to attend a state school and receive financial support. While OP supports his desire for independence, he hasn’t secured a job to contribute to rent, and there are two other roommates involved. He approached OP to be the lease guarantor for everyone, but OP declined, unwilling to jeopardize their financial stability for his aspirations. This decision has left him angry at OP, and OP’s wife is also upset. The situation raises the question: who’s at fault here?

Scroll down to read the full story.

OP’s son didn’t heed advice to attend a state school for financial help, choosing independence, but without a job, contributing to rent poses a challenge.

via reddit

With two other roommates involved, OP’s son asked OP to be a guarantor, but OP refused due to the financial risk, causing tension with both his son and wife, prompting the question of who’s at fault.

via reddit

In this complex family situation, there are various perspectives to consider. From OP’s point of view, declining to be a guarantor is a responsible financial choice. OP’s son desires independence and a broader life experience, reflecting a typical desire of young adults. However, his failure to secure a job may raise concerns about his readiness for financial responsibility. The wife’s perspective highlights the emotional strain this decision places on the family. Ultimately, the story underscores the challenges of balancing financial responsibility and personal aspirations within a family dynamic. However it is clear that this is an NTA case.

Now that you have read the story, it’s time to see what Redditors said about this. Read till the end to see other people’s opinions on this. Don’t forget to share your own opinion at the end of this article, too.

OP is NTA for wanting to protect their financial well-being.

The son could be considered TA for not securing a job before moving.

OP is responsible and does not want to take on unnecessary financial risk.

It’s fair for every father to expect their son to take more responsibility for their education and living expenses, making OP NTA.

It truly is insane.

OP’s refusal to be a guarantor doesn’t make them the a-hole; they’re protecting their interests responsibly.

OP’s son should explore alternative financial solutions rather than relying solely on his family.

OP’s concern for their financial well-being is valid and doesn’t make them TA for refusing to be a guarantor.

The son needs to grow up and take matters into his own hands by working hard.

I agree with everything said here.

What are your thoughts on this story? What would you do, or how would you react if you were in OP’s position? Your feedback means a lot to us; therefore, we want you to share your thoughts in the comment section below. For more such articles, keep visiting Defused. Have a nice day!

Cat tax