The Reddit post shared in the “ProRevenge” subreddit recounts a user’s experience where they believe the owners of their company denied them what they rightfully deserved. In response, the user decides to resign, causing the potential loss of a lucrative $3 million contract for the owners. Let’s explore two subjective perspectives on this situation and its outcomes.
OP works in the construction industry and has worked hard to be an expert at it.
OP was promoted to a foreman to handle a project at the company which got the company a big contract.
OP was doing great at his job and he got a project passed at $2.7M due to his good management.
OP was happy about it and went to the owners asking for a raise.
OP requested the following raises and told them he would be resigning if they cannot comply with the offer.
OP is bummed at the owners being greedy so he wants to part ways, so he did.
From a subjective standpoint, it can be seen as justifiable that the user took revenge by resigning, leading to the potential loss of the $3 million contract. If the owners had deliberately denied the user their deserved recognition or compensation, the user’s actions can be viewed as a form of standing up for oneself. By leaving the company, they not only made a strong statement but also potentially prevented the owners from benefiting from the lucrative contract. This perspective supports the user’s assertion that they deserved better treatment and were justified in their retaliatory actions.
On the other hand, from a different subjective perspective, it can be questioned whether the user’s revenge was an appropriate response to the situation. While feeling undervalued or denied what one deserves is undoubtedly disheartening, intentionally causing significant financial loss to the owners and potentially impacting other employees can be seen as excessive. This viewpoint suggests that seeking alternative avenues for resolution, such as negotiation or legal recourse, may have been a more measured and responsible approach. It raises concerns about the potential collateral damage caused by the user’s actions and whether the consequences align with the initial grievance.
Experiences teach you a lot more than you know.
Companies want smart people to work with them without ay raises or benefits but can’t tolerate them leaving for a better place.
Let the owners have some experience too.
Putting your interested first and fighting for it in a fair way should be every corporate worker’s motto.
All Redditors seem to be happy with OP’s decision.
Long-term employees should be having the benefits without even asking.
In conclusion, the Reddit post highlights a subjective and divisive discussion surrounding the user’s decision to seek revenge by resigning and potentially costing the owners a lucrative $3 million contract. While one subjective perspective supports the user’s actions as a means of asserting their worth, another perspective questions the appropriateness of the revenge and suggests exploring alternative solutions. It is essential to recognize the subjectivity of the situation and consider the potential implications and consequences for all parties involved. Each individual’s values and beliefs will shape their judgment regarding the user’s actions and the resulting outcomes.